Arguments should not aim to win, but instead, inspire a change of perspective
You can't truly know when you're able to make your opponent's argument better than they can until you've actually done it.
How do you know when you're "truly able to make your opponent's argument better than they can"?
You can't truly know when you're able to make your opponent's argument better than they can until you've actually done it.
How do you know when you're "truly able to make your opponent's argument better than they can"?